They say that small minds talk about people. Trump said this, Trump said that. The small fill their heads with rhetoric and try to figure out what amounts to meaningless hot air. It is a complete waste of time.
They are just words. In the action department, the domain of the mediocre thinkers, Trump has built and employed and raised the living standard of thousands of people. By contrast, Hillary has murdered and lied and extorted and has crushed the living standard of entire nations while she enriched herself.
Napoleon said “That which must be made explicit to the idiot is not worthy of my care.” He considered himself to be a great mind and preferred to engage in grand ideas.
Trump, for all his hot-air offences against the small minded, is resonating with those who see the grandness of his position. It doesn’t seem great on its face, but to be anti-war is to be anti-destruction. It is very basic human trait that really speaks to who someone is. If you are prone to war, you are filth. It means little girls will be burned to death. They are the eggs you need to scramble to make an omelette. Hillary has scrambled countless little girls in her meat grinder. Trump and Infowars are right when they say she should be in prison. Trump is the opposite. He is a builder and a deal maker. For that, he is billed as being in bed with the enemy. It’s all upside and the dumber the mark, the richer the con.
After WW II, the US was lifting its population out of poverty at a rate of 1% per year. Black men with blue collars were the greatest beneficiaries until 1965 when LBJ decided to help the black folks, and the rest is history. Blacks have been victimized by those who purport to help them. Never look to a gang of murderers for help. I think they’ve figured it out. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me from 1965 to 2016, shame on me.
Hunter S. Thompson wrote about the high water mark of the 60s movement. The mark of freedom and self determination struck the rocky shore and quietly ebbed away as thuggish socialism filled the void with government ownership of all material and sacred rights. It ruined the nation.
Ron Paul was the first major character to push against the tide of criminal ownership of the people. He planted the seed and raised awareness of America’s dire position. He was Paul Revere.
Donald Trump, the idea, not the silly rhetoric, is a symbol of the people having enough of their own victimization. The high water mark of the spirits of Mao, Stalin and Pot has reached its highest point in America. The ebb has turned into a juggernaut of a floe. The rising people are as desperate for justice and opportunity as the diminishing murderers are desperate to remain unaccountable for their crimes.
Very flawed men have lead America during its turning points in 1776 and the 1860s, but it wasn’t about the men. It was about their grand ideas. Criminal influenced polls aside, a very flawed man will again lead yet another American renaissance.
Trump said he’d “leave us in suspense” when he was asked at the third debate whether he’d accept the results of the upcoming election. His non-position is much more thoughtful than it seems.
Even Democratic strategist James Carville has admitted that there will always be a certain amount of voter fraud. He made criminality in elections sound normal. Any voter who wants to about know the Clinton legacy has mountains of insider info to follow. They are involved in rape, witness tampering, murder, war crimes, extortion, corruption and, what seems minor in comparison, voter fraud. Only an idiot would automatically pre-accept the results of an election under these circumstances. Trump knows that his confidential internal polls have him way ahead.
Trump was in the position of saying “yes, I’ll accept the results,” which would unleash the unfettered Clinton fraud machine. Trump would then have to go back on his word and call shenanigans or stick to his “I’ll accept” position. He gave the only answer that allowed a democracy to oversee a fair result. The question really asked him to agree to capitulate to fraud. Trump refused.
Clinton accused Trump of being a serial whiner for fighting for justice and taking care of number one. Trump has said the corporate establishment media is against him. Is that even in question? Trump is being Captain Obvious in this case.
Clinton tried another set up when she accused Trump of being in bed with Putin. The extreme psychopaths like Clinton only see the black and white very ends of the spectrum. They don’t understand that there is room for decency, respect and fair play without dominating others. The question was phrased sort of like “Do you want to kill Putin or sleep with him?” It would be like going on a date and asking a lady “Do you want to kill me or f#$k me?” The lady probably wanted to lay the ground work for some kind of rapport. Even the questions put to Trump are a fraud.
Every intelligence operator knows that groundwork precedes an action. Question fraud and voter fraud have to be preceded by polling fraud. We are currently observing the biggest polling fraud in U.S. history.
Thousands of people show up for Trump rallies and many are left waiting outside because the house is packed. There is a happy celebration feel to the event, despite Hillary’s main backer, George Soros, paying people to create mayhem at the rallies.
By contrast, Hillary gets a few hundred moribund zombies whose dead eyes drone “Can I go home now?” This contrast is the real poll. People who vote with their enthusiasm and their feet have resoundingly chosen Trump as their president, but I would feel better if some science was applied. It would be interesting to know if any polling data reflects the mood on the street.
Polling is very easy to skew. All you have to do is poll more democrats than Republicans and the Dems win. A sample size of more than 1000 people is considered large enough to give an accurate estimate of the public’s will. It is all about the methodology.
Recently, several grad students carefully conducted a poll that included 50,000 people. They polled 1000 people from each state. They polled 1/3 Democrats, 1/3 Republicans and 1/3 Independents. Again, Captain Obvious swooped in and declared Trump to be the winner, but the numbers are shocking. Trump took an astounding 67% of the vote. Ahhhh, that’s why Trump plays to a full house. Hillary scored just 19%, which means (again) that corporate media is dead. I mean what good are the media liars if they can’t get the establishment candidate elected? As Trump has said, psycho Hillary is not one to give up. A campaign of mass murder is just same ol’ same ol’ for her. The ends will justify the means. Now how does Hillary get 67% of the electorate to sleep with Vince Foster and Gary Webb?
Hunter S. Thompson said “When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.” Somehow, the U.S. gov’t has convinced people that it is not on a crusade for global conquest, despite having an almost omnipresent global army and being in conflict with whomever doesn’t host the U.S. army on their soil. Ignore the rhetoric and look at who is where and the dogs of obvious will bite you on the ass.
It’s the rhetoric that turns obvious, plain as day aggression into a mind boggling maze of stupid and weird explanations and lies. Remove that and things become clear. Judge them by what they do.
The U.S. should copyright “By deception, thou shalt do war,” because they are the greatest user of the notion. A good analyst will always look for the element of deception, rather than talking about the action.
The recent 600 soldier surge into a Kurdish held area in Iraq is a multi dimensional lie. First, it will be far greater than 600 troops. Add the private, off-the-books U.S. army, CIA, NSA, special forces etc and the numbers will balloon as fast as a cargo plane can fly. That is just the little lie.
The truth is that the U.S. is about to pump up the Iraqi Kurd army with weapons and training. Once trained, that army is easily transferred to Syria. It isn’t news when military aircraft fly between mid east countries because no one sees it.
The heavily controlled Iraqi Kurd army will link up with the Syrian Kurd army in northeast Syria. Then, it could go north to link up with the Turkish Kurds, which would cause huge problems for Erdogan and Turkey. It could be used as a threat just in case Erdogan gets too cozy with Putin. The Kurds may hold a secret and worthless promise from the U.S. that the future homeland of the Kurdish people is in Syria.
The Turkish Kurds could relocate to Syria, which would satisfy the Turks and everyone could sing Kumbaya as they destroy and invade a sovereign nation. A U.S. controlled Kurd nation would be a permanent threat to Turkey and would keep Erdogan in line. They could even demand the Turkish participation in Syria, or else.
KISS – Keep It Simple Stupid. This plan is about as far away from simple as anything could be. The Russians, Chinese and Syrians won’t be fooled on this file and will call in some serious manpower and hardware to thwart this newest American con game.
Russia has yet to display its massive leap in military technology. For starters, The Russian SU-30 flown by the Indian air force kicked the shit out of the American F-35 during 12 rounds of dog fight exercises. The SU 30 went 12 for 12 against the trillion dollar behemoth. The F-35 is being compared to the old Mig 21 that should be a joke on any modern battlefield. The Russians are not eager to use their S-500 anti air technology and the U.S. shouldn’t be eager either. The S-500’s ability to see stealth aircraft and to shoot them down with a stealth missile of their own will result in U.S. aircraft being disappeared without a trace. The Syrian triangle.
If my experience in the Bosnian War remains consistent, the time table for the Kurds to be trained, armed and transferred to Syria should be sometime in the spring of 2017. Look for tension to rise then.
The bottom line is that U.S. machinations in Syria can be as deceptive as they want. Eventually, things boil down to the best technology having a huge advantage. Consider this as the U.S. re-introduces the old F-16s and F-15s from the 1970s into a modern air war with modern ground defences and that no assistance will come from a trillion dollar boondoggle that flies like a Mig 21. It is the height of irrationality to possess war making junk and to be aggressive. It is another case of the Americans going weird and the Russians turning pro.
The old fact that competition serves the greater good and a monopoly crushes innovation and lets the seller charge whatever price for whatever piece of crap they produce has been confirmed in perpetuity.
There is a monopoly on the U.S. dollar by a private gang of bankers at the Federal Reserve. They answer to no one and have subjugated all the great governments via the money supply. No one knows who the secret share holders are, yet they have total control of the creation and flow of capital. And, surprise, it goes to their friends and those who endorse their agenda of conquering any nation whose banking system is outside the US Fed system.
Oppose the Fed or compete with their friends and you’ll find yourself unable to get a loan. After the Fed bought the Bosnian G-17 financial system, they recalled all loans, which meant bankruptcy for many businesses. Unemployment shot up to 60%. Scumbags, who would normally be fringe candidates, were elevated to top positions of power by getting funding from you-know-who and running away with elections. Everyone else was starved of funds. Yes, the Bosnian war was a banker conspiracy.
If the Fed wants war, everyone who needs capital better be on board or they’ll find themselves in the position of those opposition politicians in Bosnia – running a campaign or business without cash.
Almost major mainstream media (MSM), Hollywood, sports franchises etc etc, any huge business or thought impacting venue is owned by friends of the US Fed and, therefore, they have a monopoly over news and entertainment. Have you ever wondered why the US war machine flies over NFL games? The Fed wants war emulated and their friends comply.
The media is priority number one for the Fed. It can dictate what you fear, who your villains are and why young Americans go die overseas. All MSM is funded in part, by the government, which is funded by the Fed. That’s the flow. Kennedy tried to change that and have the US treasury take over the creation and flow of money. His kids grew up without a dad.
There is a crack in the MSM monopoly that started as a trickle and is now well on its way to dominating the delivery of news. The Fed is not happy about it, which means the government isn’t happy and neither are Google or Facebook. They all need money and are beholden to the Fed. A private business censorship operation is being conducted by all media. To do otherwise would anger the Fed, who would send in its hammer, the various assholes in the government (IRS, regulators etc) to sort things out.
The problem for the MSM monopoly is that too many people have seen that they are very often full of shit. The cat is out of the bag, the milk is spilled, the horse has left the barn and spouting clichés is not journalism, but I never went to journalism school.
Once people see that the media is not what they thought it was, a great demand for the real truth ensues. A hoodwinked victim will hunger for truth with a vengeance and won’t go back to the media that suckered them. Hell hath no fury like a news consumer scorned. I said I didn’t go to journalism school.
Now, it is up to competitive media (CM) to drop the ball. They have seized the news business, in part, by running counter stories on the MSM and showing news victims what shoddy journalism looks like. CM has shored up its ratings by being super sensitive about the facts. Their background as being the “Hahaha, where did you hear that? On the internet?” people has given them something to prove. They are on a mission to find truth, fact check and give it the widest audience. And they have succeeded.
When Larry King Live was on CNN back in the 90s, he had 10 million viewers a week. His replacement, Piers Morgan, was lucky to get a few hundred thousand per show and it was even less when Morgan was replaced. CNN even started a game show segment as a desperate act to at least hold the attention of some poor occupant of an old age home to stop yelling at the nurse to “turn that shit off!”
Rhetoric can be fun and illustrative but in the end, it’s just words. Words may or may not define a person. Actions speak not only louder, but should totally dominate a discussion of who someone is. Words are literally hot air, warm ink or cyber bits, but actions are reality. A bad person DOES bad things. All people SAY bad things. Judge them by what they do.
I am more than a little shocked that Trump’s decade old locker room bravado has hurt everything his actions have demonstrated. He’s built over 500 companies that employ thousands of people with many women sitting at the top of the corporate heap.
Every man in a locker room has said things similar to Trump and has spoken about his appendage being bigger than the next guy’s. Whoop-di-f&%$ing-do. The words don’t align with their actions when the same man calls his wife and asks if she needs anything from the store on the way home. The same man loves the ladies in his life and would be devastated without reciprocation from his wife, daughter, mother, sister, aunt, grandma etc. The locker room men are good men who say stupid shit while calming down after competing. Trump has apologized for his words and has nothing to apologize for when it comes to his actions. If we disregard words and judge him by his actions, Trump is a good man.
On the absolute opposite end of the spectrum sits Hillary. Her public words have always been meaningless. As a Senator, she talked about creating jobs then ran jobs out of New York. As Secretary of State she murdered entire nations and hung frantic Americans out to dry in Benghazi. Those are actions, they should define her, not the empty lies that she spews so well.
Her knowns being scary enough, I fear that all we know about Hillary is just the tip of the iceberg. A just and rational world that judges people by their actions would be horrified to look into the eyes of a terrified Juanita Broaddrick as she testified to Breitbart about Bill Clinton raping her twice in 35 minutes and nearly biting her lip off.
You don’t believe Juanita? How about Paula Jones or Kathleen Willey or even Monica Lewinsky? Monica was more of a teacher-raping-willing-student scenario, but Monica was raped nonetheless. Any resistance by Monica would’ve been dealt with summarily. Bill wasn’t one take no for an answer and he knew that the silencing element of his team would show no mercy. Enter Hillary. It would be a special person who could look a rape victim in the eyes and say “If you think round one was bad, baby, you haven’t experienced round two yet. Shut your fucking mouth or those 35 minutes will turn into 30 years of pain.”
Hillary’s just a good woman protecting her man right? Kathleen Shelton was a 12 year old girl and was raped by a scumbag. Hillary defended the scumbag and got him acquitted. I don’t have a problem with competent counsel winning. I’ve seen lawyers disgusted by the scum they represent, but they believe in the principles of justice that say everyone has the right to a fair trial. None of these lawyers celebrate that their client is back on the street. They appreciate the consequences of their legal actions.
Twice, Hillary is taped laughing about getting her guy off. She hasn’t the human component that would inspire a twinge of sadness in such a victory. And on it goes. An endless string of credible Bill Clinton rape victims followed up with an endless string of Hillary follow ups, threats and intimidation.
It astounds me that the actions of the Clinton rape team are nullified because she spews hot air to the contrary. At the same time, we nullify Trump’s grand benefits because he spoke like a cretin. Before people vote, they should ask themselves what they think is more valuable in defining a person – actions or words? Whatever the choice, things will be crystal clear.
I watched America’s top General in front of congress. It was pure political bombast that resembled the big dumb kid unilaterally laying down the rules of the sandbox like he always did. The kid failed to account for the fact that the other kids are bigger and have more resolve than in the past. Everything is on the line. Fail to dominate the sandbox by force and America could find itself out of the sandbox altogether. It would be prudent to slowly permit the other kids to have a say.
Nope. It’s all or nothing. General Milley threatened Russia, China, North Korea and Iran. He even laid out the results of the initial action that would see nuclear cruise missiles released and America losing a few carriers. Only a fool would predict the results of a massive global conflict like it’s some kind of movie. Milley tried to say that America would be hurt, but the enemy would be finished. Wrong. America is at the top and has the most to lose. Remember the British empire before WW II? They’re just an island now. Two, if you count the Falklands. And they were among the winners of the greatest war so far.
Einstein said, “I don’t know what weapons will be used to fight WW III, but WW 4 will be fought with sticks and stones.” There are a lot of things to do before the weapons are released. Getting the ducks in a row is as much about human assets as it is about hardware. Stalin purged (murdered) almost every General and most of the senior officers that had served under the Czar. The purge cost Stalin millions of lives, untold amounts of hardware and an awesome amount of territory.
Conversely, Napoleon created a meritocracy, where the elites were in direct competition with subordinates for rank and promotion. Most of Napoleon’s Martials were selected this way to the benefit of the Grande Armee.
Obama has more or less secretly purged the U.S. military’s Generals, which has resulted in what we called in the army – bag lickers – being promoted over the competent. Milley is the result of Obama embracing Stalin and rejecting Napoleon. Napoleon had the cream rising to the top of the milk. Stalin and Obama had/have the scum rising to the top of the pond. Forcing the elevation of America’s second tier of officers to the top and pushing out the able will result in order-following by the weak politically inclined officer cadre. It will also result in a dull politician’s opinion being confirmed by America’s top General, who is eager to say yes and to follow orders. The least among us are calling the shots and their imagination is in no way connected to reality.
The lead up and prosecution of a war with such imbeciles at the top will only bring disaster. The war itself could mean the end of humanity. It would be prosecuted by psychopaths from a bunker as a bunch of “plan B” Generals rally to impress their masters. All bets are off when a nation’s thoughtful intellectuals are swept aside so the bag licking class can affirm each other and take us down the road to hell.
The Guardian, the paper that adheres to the idiotic narrative that Russia attacked Georgia and the Ukraine, has written that UKIP is being run by circus clowns. It seems that the vicious newspaper clowns are at war with the political clowns. The Guardian attack on UKIP is a clown on clown crime. I say we load 20 of them into a Volkswagen and perform a high speed consecutive expulsion.
The leader of UKIP, Diane James has exhausted the notion that a woman has the prerogative to change her mind. She left the Conservatives for UKIP in 2011. She’s leaving UKIP for personal and professional reasons. That usually means a return to private life, but Diane is leaving politics and will now focus on...uh...politics. A woman is free to change her mind and to keep doing the same thing, which means she hasn’t changed her mind at all. It’s like telling your boss that you quit your job and will see him bright and early the next day.
I’ve wondered about the banker intentions with Brexit. First, I thought that the yes vote was a miscalculation by the globalist bankers. Then I thought that they could make lemonade from lemons either way. The UK is a major part of the EU economic engine. To lose it could make the EU destitute, but America is having its wealth destroyed by design. Crushing the UK could be a good example of what will happen if an EU nation decides to quit the program. Kill one, scare a thousand.
The bankers may learn that they can finance a war to murder a nation and they can move money around to leave a wealthy nation poor, but they cannot murder an idea. Theresa May knows that too. She is busy taking the UKIP ideas and branding them as Conservative. This will help her in a few ways, especially considering what has become the UKIP three-ring circus. Many UKIP voters will be fleeing the burning Volkswagen looking for a home with similar ideas. Theresa’s arms are wide open. She is either full of it and wants to kill UKIP with Conservative kindness, or she is authentic and has become subservient to a powerful idea that has embraced more than half of the UK. Only a clown would play tricks in the face of a juggernaut like the Brexit idea. Theresa will respect this idea or will pay the price and be the next lady to exercise her prerogative.
The much anticipated massive data dump that would end Hillary Clinton didn’t happen. There is no doubt that the data exists. Julian Assange, the publisher of Wikileaks has published some heroic stuff and has been a prisoner at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since August 2012. But the latest hype was about Assange, not about Hillary.
In all likelihood the data illustrates how Hillary had a hand in creating and nurturing the migrant crisis. There’s a high chance that it would connect the dots that draws a picture of the billion dollar Clinton Foundation being filled by the Saudis and others who paid a massive fee to meet and influence Madam Secretary. Some of the funds were used to buy American arms and shipped to the middle east to be accidentally dropped in crates onto ISIS positions.
Hillary has already admitted that ISIS was created by U.S. interests. Russia has long considered ISIS to be something of an American Foreign Legion. Hillary is neck deep into international terrorism and openly used her foreign legion to attack Libya and murder Qadaffi. She has directed the bombing of Syrian government forces. She is paving the way for the U.S. to abandon its constitution and power so she can hand America over to the international bankers at the U.N.
Hillary’s blood lust doesn’t stop there. Many of Bill’s rape victims were attacked, threatened and belittled by Hillary. More than 50 close Clinton associates and witnesses to their crimes are dead.
Assange created the hype that had tens of millions of people waiting. The InfoWars staff, one of the biggest online media outfits on the planet, rousted themselves out of bed at 2 a.m. to cover the event. Assange knows that you either feed the media or the media eats you. He has slighted those who supported him and they are justifiably angry.
Assange had extremely valuable information and the means to deliver it. Why did he balk? I thought his announcement of the coming data release sounded too good to be true. He must’ve known that the threats would come fast and furious from powerful murderers. This was probably by design. Make a credible threat, and wait for the enemy to make contact and suggest terms. I’m guessing they did just that. It would’ve been a straight forward conversation.
“Dump that data to the public and we’ll foment revolution in Ecuador and the new government will give you the boot. From there, it’s off to Gitmo for you, your friends and family where we’ll torture you for years and then kill you.”
Assange would inevitably ask what would happen if he didn’t release the info. He would negotiate his freedom and hopefully, the security of the data itself. He created the threat and hype as a negotiating tool. He is done as a meaningful journalist. Why would anyone send data to him now that he might end up using it for his own ends? He is now just another info suppressor.
Alex Jones from InfoWars is very upset that Assange duped everyone and he’s probably more upset that the data wasn’t released. I think Jones should celebrate. If I had any such data I wouldn’t consider sending it to Assange. It would be more logical to send it to a huge online media outlet that possesses courage and the will to fight evil on a principled and even spiritual level. Jones would have dumped the data and everyone knows it. That can’t be bad for business.
Dennis has been to 35 countries and carried a gun in most of them. He's worked as a soldier, policeman and intelligence operator before and during the Bosnian war. When looking into the abyss, he found that it has several faces and names that can and should be identified. A Henchman's Honor tells the story of his path to discovery and blows the lid off the organization of evil.