War, murders, lies, thefts, fraud and crimes of all sorts. They all require a good cover up if you want to get away with it. Simple fraudulent projects like creating a system of global taxation are easy to commit. Instill fear - you're killing the planet. It's an easy sell if the target already agrees with global totalitarianism. The end is in line with the targets' values, which makes the means almost irrelevant. So, when global warming was exposed as a fraud over and over again from many different angles, people didn't really care. The politicians pushed ahead with "investments" into the black hole of African dictatorships. Now that the end has been captured, the means doesn't matter. We no longer have to discuss the global warming fraud. You no longer have to say "I'll love you forever," after the virgin has been deflowered.
Other frauds are a bit more complicated. Many mass murder scenes in the US were the site of coincidental military/police training exercises. The Boston bombers, the California terrorist assault and the grand daddy that launched Wolfowitz's "conquer 7 countries in 5 years," program - 911. What are the odds that a military exercise would be happening in the exact same place that foreign terrorists would be assaulting? The odds should be astronomical and I've just mentioned three such cases. There are many more.
I'm forced to wonder about the obvious coordination between terror and state. The means is obvious. Kill people, scare the shit out of them and tell them what to think. Not radically different from the means conducted during the global warming fraud, but what is the end?
I noticed that no one called for gun control after the Paris attack because France is basically a gun free zone. Those zones are proven to aid and abet terrorists and psychos alike. In America, there is a strong will to remove all guns from the citizens as US military equipment finds itself in the hands of terrorists and municipal governments. So, hyper arm the government and disarm the citizens? Why are all the global warmists also backers of this scenario? It is because their values are about one world totalitarian government where the state has a monopoly on force. Two different means to the same end.
The gun debate is pretty stupid overall. I'll use my favorite anecdote. We have the predators such as leopards (criminals) and lions (government). Then we have the poor little gazelles (us). For many, the solution is to tell the leopards that they are bad and they should stop it and that the gazelle belongs to the lion. If they get caught, the lion will punish. Then, we should give the lion new teeth and sharper claws. That's dumb enough, but here's the kicker. We should knock the gazelles' horns off and file down its hooves. I'm sure that doesn't make sense to anyone, but it doesn't matter. The end goal for the lions is to have total domination with as little push back as possible. Many gazelles agree with this. A gazelle should never fight with a lion, so what business do they have running around with horns and hooves?
I digress, no argument will be heard unless it points out that guns go "boom" and kill people and the warm and fuzzy government should be the only entity with guns. It doesn't matter that that scenario has resulted in upwards of 200 million people being murdered by their own governments in the 20th century. Global socialism will advance! Damn all the facts and rationality!
It seems that a coordinated agenda exists, but who is the top dog who will benefit from this? We could say big government, but that's pretty vague. I think we need to examine who has the power to commit and finance such atrocities, then cover up the atrocities. Follow the money. It's a short journey. All money in the western world is tied to the US dollar, whose creation and flow since 1913 has been dictated by the US Federal Reserve Bank. (The Fed)
How much power do bankers have? It was Paul Wolfowitz, former president of the world bank, who wrote the plan for America to invade 7 countries in 5 years. This story is public knowledge and has been told by former General Wesley Clark.
I think Kennedy (JFK) drives my question home. JFK wanted to pull out of Nam. It angered the Fed and the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). Kennedy wouldn't invade Cuba. It angered the Fed and the MIC. Kennedy went after the mob after it helped him get elected and yes, it angered them. Kennedy may have escaped the wrath of all his enemies, but then he tackled the same people Lincoln tackled before he was murdered. JFK began the process of having his treasury decide on the creation and flow of the US money supply. The murderous bankers had to act or become irrelevant. JFK was murdered and no president since has challenged the Fed.
The act of mass serial murder itself takes monumental planning and coordination. The cover up requires as much or more coordination. Imagine a perpetrator of a crime knowing that his crime would be investigated by every asset on the planet. The CIA, FBI, cops, informants, foreign intelligence services etc would put everything on hold and investigate just one crime. The criminal would have to have immense power to remain free. Dozens of questions remain unanswered about 911, JFK and the recent spate of "terrorism" in the US that the phony commissions don't even contemplate. I don't think incompetence is the issue, which leaves us with a cover up. The JFK murder was followed by a huge string of witnesses suffering from accidents and disease. The lucky ones just had their testimony ignored.
If answered, my headline question reveals the source and benefactor of all the mayhem. Promoting a powerless society, shutting down industry and making society so poor that every international, federal, province/state, municipal government and YOU will have to go into debt to make anything happen. Every entity will work not to enhance their lives, but to pay the interest on their bank debt.
The Fed aims to conquer the world and enslave it. We've come to the point where a president of the world bank is ordering us to invade the globe and we are following orders. It is in writing, it is in practice and credible witnesses have spoken out.
The first step, if you want to avoid your enslavement, is to believe that money can be the root of all evil and the Fed is the root of all money. General Wesley Clark (ret) and Wolfowitz himself openly planned to wage aggressive war. What's more evil than that?Objectivity means nothing if you don't have all the facts to work with. Would an objective person with all the facts believe that man causes global warming? I think not. Is it logical to saw the horns off the gazelle? The greatest question is not so much understanding that all the lies are lies, but that the truth is subject to diminishment, obfuscation, distraction and ridicule. It's no longer something to rally behind, The truth is a target that needs to be destroyed. Who has the means, motive and opportunity to create distractions, control the narrative and suppress the truth? It's the same force of evil who murder presidents and wage aggressive war.
Dennis has been to 35 countries and carried a gun in most of them. He's worked as a soldier, policeman and intelligence operator before and during the Bosnian war. When looking into the abyss, he found that it has several faces and names that can and should be identified. A Henchman's Honor tells the story of his path to discovery and blows the lid off the organization of evil.